| Dominant model | Recessive model |
---|
 | Exposure (%) | No. of cases required | Exposure (%) | No. of cases required |
---|
Allele frequency (%) |  | α = 0.05 | α = 0.005 |  | α = 0.05 | α = 0.005 |
---|
10 | 19 | 430 | 711 | 1 | 6113 | 10,070 |
20 | 36 | 311 | 516 | 4 | 1,600 | 2,637 |
30 | 51 | 308 | 512 | 9 | 769 | 1,269 |
40 | 64 | 354 | 590 | 16 | 485 | 802 |
50 | 75 | 456 | 762 | 25 | 363 | 602 |
60 | 84 | 661 | 1,107 | 36 | 311 | 516 |
- There were two controls per case; a detectable difference of OR is 1.5 or more; power = 80%. The allele frequencies shown are those in controls. Exposure (that is, prevalence) is that in controls assuming a diallelic locus with a dominant or recessive allele at Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. In the dominant model, estimates are for an OR of 1.5 between cases and controls for the possession of at least one copy of disease-associated SNP by case; in the recessive model, estimates are for an OR of 1.5 between cases and controls for the possession of two copies of disease-associated SNP by case.