Skip to main content

Table 3 Quantification and statistical significance of monocyte migration and pSmad 2/3 staining data

From: Differential regulation of cell functions by CSD peptide subdomains

Monocytes

Peptide

Migration

Statistical significance

pSmad 2/3

Statistical significance

Normal

Control

20.1 ± 2.5

 

26.3 ± 1.1

 

Normal

CSD

12.6 ± 2.1

p < 0.05 vs Normal/Control

16.4 ± 0.5

p < 0.01 vs Normal/Control

Normal

Cav-A

48.4 ± 7.8

p < 0.01 vs Normal/Control

31.0 ± 1.1

p < 0.05 vs Normal/Control

Normal

Cav-B

35.4 ± 4.5

p < 0.01 vs Normal/Control

16.6 ± 1.6

p < 0.01 vs Normal/Control

Normal

Cav-C

27.1 ± 2.1

 

19.1 ± 1.5

p < 0.01 vs Normal/Control

Normal

Cav-AB

37.8 ± 8.7

p < 0.05 vs Normal/Control

26.8 ± 1.4

 

Normal

Cav-BC

32.6 ± 5.1

p < 0.05 vs Normal/Control

18.4 ± 1.2

p < 0.01 vs Normal/Control

Normal + TGFβ

Control

99.9 ± 11.7

p < 0.001 vs Normal/Control

43.1 ± 0.9

p < 0.01 vs Normal/Control

Normal + TGFβ

CSD

18.7 ± 4.5

p < 0.01 vs Normal + TGFβ/Control

21.2 ± 1.2

p < 0.01 vs Normal + TGFβ/Control

Normal + TGFβ

Cav-A

47.4 ± 5.5

p < 0.01 vs Normal + TGFβ/Control

37.7 ± 1.2

 

Normal + TGFβ

Cav-B

47.6 ± 4.4

p < 0.01 vs Normal + TGFβ/Control

40.7 ± 1.2

 

Normal + TGFβ

Cav-C

36.2 ± 3.0

p < 0.01 vs Normal + TGFβ/Control

43.0 ± 1.1

 

Normal + TGFβ

Cav-AB

37.7 ± 3.5

p < 0.01 vs Normal + TGFβ/Control

39.0 ± 1.5

 

Normal + TGFβ

Cav-BC

25.9 ± 5.7

p < 0.01 vs Normal + TGFβ/Control

18.7 ± 1.4

p < 0.01 vs Normal + TGFβ/Control

SSc

Control

303 ± 32

p < 0.001 vs Normal/Control

54.1 ± 1.0

p < 0.01 vs Normal/Control

SSc

CSD

77 ± 10

p < 0.01 vs SSc/Control

37.6 ± 0.7

p < 0.01 vs SSc/Control

SSc

Cav-A

334 ± 44

 

49.1 ± 3.1

 

SSc

Cav-B

Not Done

 

48.4 ± 1.5

 

SSc

Cav-C

Not Done

 

49.3 ± 1.2

 

SSc

Cav-AB

Not Done

 

46.1 ± 3.0

 

SSc

Cav-BC

138 ± 24

p < 0.02 vs SSc/Control

36.6 ± 1.4

p < 0.01 vs SSc/Control

  1. Data from Figure 2 (migration) and Figure 3 (image analyses of pSmad 2/3 staining) are presented in terms of average value ± s.e.m. The statistical significance of the indicated comparisons were determined using Students’ t test.