Skip to main content

Table 1 Criteria for Evaluating Genetic Association Studies

From: Reporting and evaluating genetic association studies

Elements

Comment

SNP Discovery and Genotyping (Completeness)

SNP discovery and genotyping of a gene should be complete (based on current literature AND re-sequencing of the gene in a subgroup of the population studied).

Haplotype Analysis

Haplotype analyses should be reported.

Population Size

Size should be large enough to have reasonable power to avoid both false negative and false positive results

Matching Cases and Controls

Appropriate matching is always a consideration

Population Stratification

Population stratification should always be addressed (in some manner)

Phenotype Definition

The best genetic association studies employ a robust definition of the phenotype (i.e. a physician's diagnosis of asthma is much less robust than one based on physiologic and clinical criteria)

Multiple Testing (Comparisons)

Inter-Related Phenotypes

Issue of multiple testing must always be addressed, while acknowledging that some phenotypes are inter-related (and not independent), and Bonferroni correction may be too conservative

Replication and Role of Functional Studies

Replication is necessary unless it cannot be reasonably performed. In some cases, functional studies substitute for replication