Safer (but not better) imaging
- Stephen Ellis1
© Biomed Central Ltd 2001
Received: 17 May 2001
Published: 14 September 2001
Screening for lung cancer, based on plain chest X-ray (CXR), failed to demonstrate a reduction in mortality (see Additional information [1,2]). The potential of low-dose computed tomography (CT), which is more sensitive and specific than CXR, to identify early surgically curable lung cancers, has renewed interest in lung cancer screening. Very low dose CT scanning has reduced the radiation dose of a screening chest CT to about 10 times that of CXR. Further reduction in radiation dose will enhance the suitability of CT as a screening modality, but will the image quality be sufficient?
The authors found that the lowest-dose technique using their new filter was superior to CXR and as good as conventional CT in detecting nodules greater than 5 mm. They conclude that further reduction in radiation dose of CT scanning for lung cancer screening is possible by using an appropriate filter.
This paper reflects a drive toward making CT scanning an acceptable modality for lung cancer screening. The authors have reduced the radiation dose from CT scanning by a further 50% compared to previous low dose CT techniques without, according to them, a significant reduction in image quality. The 5 mm cut-off for significant lesions is reasonable; nodules of less than 5 mm will be assigned to conventional follow-up in the proposed UK screening trial. Image quality at the apices is poor with low-dose techniques and lung cancer screening with CT scanning has yet to be shown to be effective. It is likely that screening trials, endeavouring to demonstrate the efficacy of CT scanning, are likely to adopt a protocol that is acceptable on dose criteria resulting in the minimum reduction in image quality. Even though lower dose techniques will be available, their efficacy in terms of screening will not have been evaluated.
Spiral CT, x-ray filtering
Miller AB: Screening (lung cancer).
Kubik A, Polak J: Lung cancer detection. Results of a randomized prospective study in Czechoslovakia.
Cancer 1986, 57:2427-2437.