COPD diagnosis related to different guidelines and spirometry techniques
© Nathell et al. 2007
Received: 26 March 2007
Accepted: 04 December 2007
Published: 04 December 2007
The aim was to compare the diagnosis of COPD among smokers according to different international guidelines and to compare the outcome when using slow (SVC) and forced vital capacity (FVC).
In order to find current smokers a questionnaire was sent to persons who had been on sick leave for more than two weeks. Those who smoked more than 8 cigarettes per day were invited to perform a spirometry.
Totally 3,887 spirometries were performed. In this sample 10.2% fulfilled the NICE COPD-criteria, 14.0% the GOLD COPD-criteria and 21.7% the ERS COPD criteria. The diagnosis according to NICE and GOLD guidelines is based on FVC and in the ERS guidelines the best value of either SVC or FVC is used. Thus, substantially more subjects with COPD were found when the best of either SVC or FVC was used. Forced VC tended to be higher than SVC when lung function was normal and in those with mild obstruction prior to bronchodilatation whereas SVC exceeded FVC after bronchodilatation in those who had severe bronchial obstruction.
The diagnosis of COPD is highly depending on which guidelines are used for defining the disease. If FVC and not the best of SVC and FVC is used when defining COPD the diagnosis will be missed in a substantial number of patients.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality amongst the adult population worldwide . Spirometry is the gold standard for diagnosing and monitoring progression of COPD  which is defined by irreversible lung function impairment with a reduced FEV1/vital capacity (VC) ratio. However, differences in the definition of COPD in guidelines and consensus statements make it difficult to quantify the morbidity and to make comparisons between countries. In addition, there are different recommendations in the major guidelines and consensus statements concerning how to perform spirometry [2–4].
In the present study smokers were identified among patients being on sick leave registered in a Swedish database (Collective Bargaining Goup Sickness Insurance). The smokers were invited to perform a spirometry and the aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of COPD using the definitions and recommendations from the European Respiratory Society (ERS) from 1995, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)/World Health Organization (WHO) Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). A further aim was to compare the number of subjects with COPD when the COPD diagnosis was based on slow (SVC) or forced vital capacity (FVC) when defining airway obstruction (FEV1/VC).
In order to identify current smokers for a smoking cessation programme a questionnaire containing questions on smoking habits was sent to persons 40 to 60 years of age, who had been on sick leave, regardless of cause, for more than two weeks. The persons were identified using the database from the Collective Bargaining Goup Sickness Insurance, AGS (in Swedish: Avtalsgruppsjukförsäkring) . The questionnaire was sent to all persons registered in AGS during the period 1 April 1998 to 30 November 2000. To find persons with a potential risk of having COPD those who, according to the questionnaire, currently smoked more than eight cigarettes per day were invited to perform a spirometry.
Lung function testing was performed at ten different laboratories by experienced and specially trained technicians. Regular meetings were held to reinforce the recommended techniques. Spirometry was performed according to the ATS recommendations  with a few modifications. The spirometry was performed in the sitting position and a nose clip was used. After 2 – 3 slow expiratory vital capacity measurements, at least three forced expirations were performed. Spirometry was performed before and, in a selected group of patients, 15 minutes after inhalation of salbutamol dry powder (0.8 mg Ventolin™ Discus™, GlaxoWellcome). Reversibility test was only performed in those who, prior to bronchodilatation, had a SVC/FEV1 or FVC/FEV1 below 0.75. Short acting bronchodilator medication was withheld four hours and long acting bronchodilators twelve hours before the reversibility testing. European reference values were used .
Definitions of COPD according to the ERS consensus statement, the NICE and the GOLD guidelines.
FEV1/(VC or FVC)
< 88% pred for men
Only for staging
< 89% pred for women
< 70% absolute value
< 80% predicted
< 70% absolute value
Only for staging
In the present study lung function was calculated after bronchodilatation, according to NICE, ERS and GOLD guidelines and FEV1/VC ratio was calculated by using only FVC or the best out of FVC and SVC. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (reg.no. 98:044).
Of those who completed spirometry 1,763 (45.4%) were men, 51.6 (46.2 – 56.1) years of age (median and 25th -75th percentiles), and 2124 (54.6%) were women, 50.8 (46.2 – 56.1) years of age.
Diagnosis of COPD and reversibility tests.
COPD diagnosis using only FVC (%)
COPD diagnosis using best value of SVC and FVC (%)
Reversibility among subjects with COPD (according to ERS, NICE and GOLD guidelines using the best of SVC and FVC)
Percent of predicted (mean; 95%CI)
Percent of pre-bronchodilator (mean; 95%CI)
In the present study of almost 4000 smokers, smoking more than 8 cigarettes per day, it was demonstrated that the prevalence of COPD differed depending on which guidelines are used and whether the best of slow and forced VC or only FVC were used. It was also shown that FVC exceeded SVC in persons with normal lung function as assessed by spirometry wheras the opposite was found in patients with impaired lung function. Inhalation of a bronchodilator attenuated, but did not abolish, the effect of lung function impairment on the difference between SVC and FVC.
The definition of COPD is arbitrary and varies between different consensus statements and guidelines. In the present study the number of smokers, 40–60 years of age, who got COPD diagnosis varied with a factor two (from 10% to 22%) depending on what definition was used. This variation exceeds somewhat was recently was demonstrated in an epidemiological setting which, based on a random sample of 666 subjects, demonstrated prevalence figures of 7.6 – 14.1% when defining COPD according to different recommendations. . The COPD diagnosis was thus highly dependent on which guidelines the diagnosis was based but also on the measurement of vital capacity. If only FVC was measured the prevalence of COPD was up to 4.1 percentage units lower than if a slow SVC also was measured and the best value of SVC and FVC was chosen for the FEV1/vital capacity ratio.
The main reason for the large difference in the prevalence of COPD between the ERS and NICE definitions is that the NICE guidelines require a FEV1 less than 80% of the predicted value. In the GOLD and the ERS/ATS guidelines from 2004 post-bronchodilator values are used for calculation of the FEV1/VC ratio leading to a lower prevalence of COPD than if the ERS definition is applied. The exclusion of persons with a low FEV1/VC ratio, implying airway obstruction, but with a FEV1 within two standard residuals of the predicted mean, is probably justified in a clinical setting. For epidemiological or preventive purposes this exclusion of a vast number of persons with mild COPD is more doubtful. In all three guidelines the importance of early detection and active smoking intervention is emphasized and it therefore seems prudent to also include mild disease (as in ERS and GOLD) in the definition of COPD in order to intensify the efforts of smoking cessation. The population impact of different definitions of airway obstruction has been described by Celli and coworkers  and our results further stress the need for a clear definition of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for both epidemiological and clinical purposes.
In the NICE and GOLD guidelines, obstruction is defined as a FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7. The ERS defines COPD as FEV1/(FVC or SVC) < 88% predicted value in men and < 89% of predicted value in women (i.e. > 1.64 residual standard deviation below predicted value). Since the predicted value of FEV1/SVC declines with age and the limit is higher for women (89% of predicted), the COPD diagnosis according to the ERS-definition, will include young females and exclude older men to a greater extent than the NICE and the GOLD definitions. This limitation of the GOLD criteria (in particular) for diagnosing COPD in elderly people has been described by Hardie and coworkers . An important clinical implication of this is that the diagnosis of COPD may be delayed in women when the GOLD and NICE guidelines are used instead of the ERS recommendations. This is particularly contentious since smoking women are more susceptible to COPD [11, 12]. In addition, men have a higher success rate in smoking cessation, which may indicate that more intensive effort is needed at an earlier stage in guiding women to successful smoking cessation [13, 14].
The way of calculating the FEV1/VC ratio also substantially influences the prevalence of COPD. The use of either slow vital capacity (SVC) or forced vital capacity (FVC) is suggested in the ERS consensus statement from 1995 whereas the GOLD, the NICE and the ATS/ERS guidelines from 2004 only suggest the use of FVC. If the best value of FVC or SVC is used for the calculation of the FEV1/VC ratio instead of FVC the prevalence of COPD increases with 10–20% as shown in the present study. The disadvantage of using only FVC was greater in men and persons with impaired lungfuction (low VC and FEV1). Although this disadvantage diminished after bronchodilatation, it remained and could therefore not be neglected. The clinical implication of this is that a diagnosis of COPD may be overlooked if SVC is not performed, a risk that seems to be especially high in men with mild disease. Several papers have been published describing the differences between the FVC and the slow SVC in small groups of patients (< 100) with chronic airways obstruction [15–17] but the present study is the first using a large population dataset.
The reversibility to a bronchodilator (salbutamol) in the COPD patients was somewhat different depending on how COPD was defined. The NICE guidelines require a FEV1 below 80% of predicted value which reduces the number of positive diagnosis but, as these patients have a lower pre-bronchodilator FEV1, leave a greater space for increase following inhalation of a bronchodilator.
Uniform international standards for the diagnosis of COPD are lacking. The existing major consensus statements and guidelines, regarding the diagnosis of COPD, yield differences in prevalence rates, which perhaps reflect that the different guidelines may primarily be intended for either clinical use or for screening and prevention. This complicates the organization of appropriate epidemiological surveys and comparisons between countries. Our results indicate that both the FVC and the SVC manoeuvre should be performed when persons at risk for COPD are examined. We also fully agree with the generally accepted concept to diagnose COPD based on lung function measurements after bronchodilatation.
European Respiratory Society
National Institute for Clinical Excellence
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
World Health Organization
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
Forced Vital Capacity
Slow Vital Capacity
Collective Bargaining Group Sickness Insurance (in Swedish: Avtalsgruppsjukförsäkring)
American Thoracic Society
We thank Anna-Greta Sjödin, Kirsten Jörgensen and Henrik Kok, Åre; Lennart Öhman, Umeå; Eva Eriksson, Ulla Palmqvist, Östersund; Camilla Kallin, Britt-Marie Sundblad, Katarina Söderström, Kerstin Örnefalk, Sten Salomonsson, Stockholm; Margareta Larsson, Örebro; Barbro Magnusson, Helena Lagerlöf-Ljung, Karlskrona; Karin Nilsson, Karlshamn; Yvonne Hagberg, Göteborg; Patricia K. Alumets, Miriam Walsh-Ingelström, Lund, for their work in examining the study subjects. Financial funding for this study was received from the research department of AFA (former AMF) insurance company, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Murray CJ, Lopez AD: Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997,349(9063):1436–1442.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS, GOLD Scientific Committee : Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001,163(5):1256–1276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. National clinical guideline on management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care.Thorax 2004,59(Suppl 1):1–232.
- Siafakas NM, Vermeire P, Pride NB, Paoletti P, Gibson J, Howard P, Yernault JC, Decramer M, Higenbottam T, Postma DS, Rees J: Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). European Respiratory Journal 1995,8(8):1398–1420.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nathell L, Malmberg P, Lundback B, Nygren A: Is asthma underestimated as a cause of sick leave? Respiratory Medicine 2000,94(10):977–982.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- American Thoracic Society: Standardization of spirometry-1987 update. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987, 136:1285–1298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault J-C: Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl 1993, 16:5–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindberg A, Jonsson AC, Ronmark E, Lundgren R, Larsson LG, Lundback B: Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to BTS, ERS, GOLD and ATS criteria in relation to doctor's diagnosis, symptoms, age, gender, and smoking habits. Respiration 2005,72(5):471–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Celli BR, Halbert RJ, Isonaka S, Schau B: Population impact of different definitions of airway obstruction. Eur Respir J 2003,22(2):268–273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardie JA, Buist AS, Vollmer WM, Ellingsen I, Bakke PS, Morkve O: Risk of over-diagnosis of COPD in asymptomatic elderly never-smokers. Eur Respir J 2002,20(5):1117–1122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y, Horne S, Dosman J: Increased susceptibility to lung dysfunction in female smokers. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991,143(6):1224–1230.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tanoue LT: Cigarette smoking and women's respiratory health. Clinics in Chest Medicine 2000,21(1):47–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bjornson W, Rand C, Connett JE, Lindgren P, Nides M, Pope F, Buist AS, Hoppe-Ryan C, O'Hara P: Gender differences in smoking cessation after 3 years in the Lung Health Study. American Journal of Public Health 1995,85(2):223–230.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Blake SM, Klepp KI, Pechacek TF, Folsom AR, Luepker RV, Jacobs DR, Mittelmark MB: Differences in smoking cessation strategies between men and women. Addictive Behaviors 1989,14(4):409–418.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brusasco V, Pellegrino R, Rodarte JR: Vital capacities in acute and chronic airway obstruction: dependence on flow and volume histories. Eur Respir J 1997,10(6):1316–1320.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chhabra SK: Forced vital capacity, slow vital capacity, or inspiratory vital capacity: which is the best measure of vital capacity? J Asthma 1998,35(4):361–365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gove RI, Shepherd J, Burge PS: Variability and reversibility of the slow and forced vital capacity in chronic airflow obstruction. Br J Dis Chest 1987,81(2):182–185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.