Isolation and characterisation of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells from patients with severe emphysema
© Mackay et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 July 2012
Accepted: 15 February 2013
Published: 20 February 2013
Loss of the pulmonary microvasculature in the pathogenesis of emphysema has been put forward as a credible alternative to the classical inflammatory cell driven proteolysis hypothesis. Mechanistic studies in this area have to date employed animal models, immortalised cell lines, primary endothelial cells isolated from large pulmonary arteries and non-pulmonary tissues and normal human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells. Although these studies have increased our understanding of endothelial cell function, their relevance to mechanisms in emphysema is questionable. Here we report a successful technique to isolate and characterise primary cultures of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells from individuals with severe emphysema.
A lobe of emphysematous lung tissue removed at the time of lung transplantation surgery was obtained from 14 patients with severe end-stage disease. The pleura, large airways and large blood vessels were excised and contaminating macrophages and neutrophils flushed from the peripheral lung tissue before digestion with collagenase. Endothelial cells were purified from the cell mixture via selection with CD31 and UEA-1 magnetic beads and characterised by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry.
Successful isolation was achieved from 10 (71%) of 14 emphysematous lungs. Endothelial cells exhibited a classical cobblestone morphology with high expression of endothelial cell markers (CD31) and low expression of mesenchymal markers (CD90, αSMA and fibronectin). E-selectin (CD62E) was inducible in a proportion of the endothelial cells following stimulation with TNFα, confirming that these cells were of microvascular origin.
Emphysematous lungs removed at the time of transplantation can yield large numbers of pulmonary microvasculature endothelial cells of high purity. These cells provide a valuable research tool to investigate cellular mechanisms in the pulmonary microvasculature relevant to the pathogenesis of emphysema.
KeywordsPrimary cell isolation Microvasculature Emphysema
Lung endothelial cell injury is hypothesised to be a key event in the pathogenesis of emphysema [1, 2] and forms an increasingly credible “microvascular hypothesis” as an alternative to the classical hypothesis in which inflammatory cells are seen as the orchestrators of tissue destruction . A number of models have been employed to investigate the role of the pulmonary endothelium ranging from in-vitro cellular systems to in-vivo animal models. Early cellular studies were based on large vessel endothelial cells, typically from the main pulmonary trunk, or used human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) as a surrogate for the lung microvasculature . Immortalised human cells lines have also been used as they provide a stable cell population and are easily expanded for use in a range of assays. However such cells, which evade the normal controls within the cell cycle , do not always express markers characteristic of the tissue in which they originated [6, 7] and their responses ex vivo may not reflect the true in vivo response of cells to injury, thus limiting their relevance [8, 9]. Pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells, which form the luminal barrier of intra-acinar arterioles and venules and the alveolar capillary network have also been isolated from bovine , ovine  and rodent lungs  which provide more biologically relevant models in which endothelial cell responses to injury can be studied. Although these systems may not accurately reflect human cellular responses, they have facilitated the development of methods to effectively isolate lung microvascular endothelial cells (LMVECs) from normal human tissue [13–15] and such cells are now available from a number of commercial suppliers. These commercially available primary LMVECs have the advantage of being fully compliant with regulatory legislation and information regarding patient age and in some cases smoking status is available. However, it is impossible to determine whether the individuals from whom cells were isolated had normal pulmonary function or whether they had any pre-existing lung disease. The ability to compare cellular responses in disease free individuals with those who have developed severe disease is very attractive given the observation that only about 20% of individuals who smoke develop emphysema  suggesting that the pathology reflects an individual’s disordered cellular response to the injury rather than the injury per se. Thus, comparing how lung microvascular endothelial cells from susceptible individuals behave in contrast to lung microvascular endothelial cells isolated from individuals free from emphysema may provide unique insights into the cellular responses to cigarette smoke which lead to emphysema.
In this study we present, to our knowledge, the first report of successful isolation of LMVECs from well characterised patients with severe emphysema. The cells from emphysematous lung were then characterised and compared with LMVECs from pathologically normal lung tissue derived from patients undergoing isolated lung cancer resection surgery and with commercially available LMVECs.
Ethical approval to obtain emphysematous tissue from patients undergoing lung transplantation was granted by the Northumberland Local Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 06/Q0902/57). All patients awaiting lung transplantation for emphysema at Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK were invited to take part in the study. Patients gave informed consent to donate their explanted lung for research purposes. The study was performed in accordance with ICH-GCP.
Ethical approval to obtain normal tissue from patients undergoing lobectomy/ pneumonectomy was granted by County Durham and Tees Valley 2 Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 09/H0908/35). Patients between the ages of 18–75 years undergoing lobectomy/ pneumonectomy with no evidence of emphysema/ fibrosis on radiology or pulmonary function testing were invited to take part in the study. The study was performed in accordance with ICH-GCP.
Clinical data including age, body mass index and pulmonary function tests were obtained from each individual who donated tissue. Smoking status and smoking history from each patient was also obtained. Those with emphysema were also categorized according to the updated GOLD criteria (2003) [17, 18].
Obtaining diseased lung tissue
At the time of transplantation, the lung was inspected to confirm the macroscopic pathology was in keeping with pre-operative diagnosis and to exclude any unexpected pathology. A lobe or part of a lobe was then dissected and stored at 4°C until clinical pathology assessment (which was typically performed within 12 hours). Following routine clinical pathology, blocks of tissue were fixed in neutral buffered formalin for investigative pathology. The remaining tissue (typically around 50 g) was used immediately for cell isolation.
Obtaining normal tissue
The operating surgeon performing lobectomy for suspected lung cancer identified a wedge of normal tissue within the tissue removed at surgery but discrete from the tumor resection margins. This was dissected from the remaining tissue and tumour and placed in media. Both samples were transported to clinical pathology where the wedge sample was inspected and once confirmed to be free from disease, was used immediately for cell isolation. Tissue samples ranged from 5-30 g.
Contaminating macrophages were removed via repeated inflation of the tissue with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The pleura, visible arterioles, bronchioles and venules were then dissected to prevent overgrowth with mesothelial and epithelial cells and reduce contamination with macrovascular endothelial cells. The remaining peripheral lung tissue was washed in RPMI containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% penicillin streptomycin and amphotericin (PSA) and finely chopped (1-2 mm2 pieces). The tissue pieces were then washed on a 40 μm filter to remove red blood cells before incubation with 0.2% type II collagenase (CLS-2, Worthington) in RPMI containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 2 hours on a roller at room temperature. Following incubation, the suspension was filtered on a 400-500 μm mesh and then a 100 μm sterile filter. The filtrate was centrifuged (250 g for 5 minutes). The supernatant was discarded and resulting cell pellet re-suspended in endothelial growth MV2 media (Promocell) containing 1% PSA. An automated cell count was performed and cells plated onto flasks pre-coated with 0.2% gelatin (w/v in MilliQ water, coated for 30 min at room temperature, excess gelatin solution was removed before cell addition) at approximately 10,000 cells/cm2. Cells were cultured at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2. Non-adherent cells were removed after 24 hours in culture by gentle flushing with PBS over the flasks. MV2 media was replaced every 3–4 days.
Endothelial cell purification
When the cells reached approximately 80% confluence, they were passaged using cell dissociation solution (Sigma) and separated from any contaminating fibroblast and epithelial cells using CD31 Dynal beads (Invitrogen) and pre-prepared Ulex europaeus agglutinin-1 (UEA-1) coated Dynal beads. UEA-1 binds to the α-L-Fucosyl residues of glycoprotein present on the surface of human microvascular endothelial cells, thus in conjugation with magnetic beads allows the selection of endothelial cells from a mixed cell suspension . The cells were re-suspended in PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 2 mM EDTA (Dynal Buffer) and 25 ul each of CD31 Dynal beads and UEA-1 coated beads were added. The cells/beads mixture was incubated on a rocker at 4°C for 20 minutes, to minimise non-specific binding. The beads were then washed in Dynal buffer and placed in a Dynal magnet. The bead negative fluid was discarded. After repeated washing and magnetic separation, the bead positive cells were counted and plated on 0.2% gelatin coated tissue culture flasks at approximately 3,000 cells/cm2 and incubated at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2. Bead separation was performed over 3–5 passages of the cells until pure cobblestone cultures were obtained.
Cryopreservation of cells
When cultures appeared free from contaminating cells, cells were cryopreserved in MV2 media (Promocell) containing 1% DMSO (Sigma). All emphysema cultures were cryopreserved and then later reanimated for characterisation and explorative experiments.
Commercial human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells
Commercial LMVECs were purchased from Promocell (C12281) and cultured after reanimation at 37°C with 5% CO2 using endothelial growth MV2 media (Promocell) supplemented with 1% PSA (as used with cells isolated from patients).
All isolated cells and commercial cells were routinely tested for mycoplasma infection using Myco Alert kits (LT07-218, Lonza). Testing was carried out on all isolated cells prior to experimentation and on commercial cells on a monthly basis. The cells showed no evidence of mycoplasma infection.
Phase contrast microscopy
Cells were grown to confluence and images taken on Canon image shot.
Cells were cultured on 18 mm glass coverslips in 12 well plates. At confluence, cells were washed in PBS and fixed in freshly prepared paraformaldehyde (4%). Following fixation, cells were quenched in 100 mM glycine for 30 minutes, before permeabilisation in PBS Triton X-100 (1% v/v) for 20 minutes. Following permeabilisation, cells were washed with PBS containing 0.2% tween (0.2% PBST) and PBS. After blocking with 5% BSA for 60 minutes, coverslips were incubated with primary antibodies (CD31 (Sc53411, Santa Cruz) Fibronectin (F3648, Sigma), αSMA, (F3777, Sigma) in 0.5% BSA overnight at 4°C. Cells were then washed as before with 0.2% PBST and PBS. Fluorochrome pre-conjugated secondary antibodies (FITC: Mouse (F2012) and TRITC: Rabbit (T6778), Sigma) were then applied (0.5% BSA) for 60 minutes and then washed in 0.2% PBST and PBS. The cells were then mounted with DAPI mounting medium (H-1200, Vector Labs) and viewed on a Leica Sp2UV laser scanning confocal microscope and analysed with software from Leica (LCS 2.61).
Initial experiments to determine optimal concentrations of antibodies were conducted using microvascular endothelial cells purchased from Promocell. Each cell population was stained using the same conditions.
Cells at 70-80% confluence were used in all characterisation experiments. Cells were harvested using cell dissociation solution (Sigma) with approximately 100,000 cells per 100 ul used for each stain. Cells were washed and re-suspended in 100 ul PBS and incubated with FITC conjugated CD31 (#555445 BD Bioscience) and PE cy5 conjugated CD90 (# 555597 BD Bioscience) for 30 minutes at 4°C, to reduce non-specific binding. Cells were then washed in PBS, centrifuged at 250 g for 4 minutes, re-suspended in 200 ul PBS and analysed on FACS Scan (Becton Dickinson).
Cells were grown in 6 well plates and at 70-80% confluence were treated with TNFα (1 ng/ml). Following treatment cells were harvested using cell dissociation solution with approximately 100,000 cells per 100 ul used for each stain. Cells were washed and re-suspended in 100 ul PBS and incubated with APC conjugated CD62E (E-selectin) (#551144 BD Bioscience) for 30 minutes at 4°C, to reduce non-specific binding. Cells were then washed in PBS, centrifuged at 250 g for 4 minutes, re-suspended in 200 ul PBS and analysed on FACS Scan.
Patient characteristics and cell yield
Smoking History (Pack yrs)
Cell yield (passage number at cryopreservation)
1.9 ×106 cells (passage 4)
2.5 ×106 cells (passage 4)
9.4 ×106 cells (passage 5)
5.4 ×106 cells (passage 4)
5.6 ×106 cells (passage 4)
28.8 ×106 cells (passage 5)
12 ×106 cells (passage 4)
3.2 ×106 cells (passage 4)
21.5 ×106 cells (passage 6)
5.2 ×106 cells (passage 6)
5.4 ×106 cells (passage 4)
18.2 ×106 cells (passage 6)
13.9 ×106 cells (passage 4)
1 ×106 cells (passage 3)
Phase contrast microscopy of isolated cells
Characterisation of cells via confocal microscopy
Characterisation of cells via flow cytometry
Microvascular endothelial cells have been isolated previously from a variety of organs including human lung, however we present the first report of a method to successfully isolate such cells from emphysematous lung tissue. This method allows ex vivo study of a cell population which may be key in the pathogenesis of emphysema. Importantly, the method we have developed allows the isolation and culture of large numbers of human LMVECs (Table 1) with a high success rate (71%). Furthermore, the cells could be successfully expanded, cryopreserved and later re-animated for use in future studies. Cells showed stability of phenotype to passage 7.
Certain steps were critical to the success of this method. The tissue could be stored for up to 24 hours from the time of transplant until histopathological processing, however once processing began, cell isolation had to follow immediately otherwise it was unsuccessful. Careful dissection of the large vessels and removal of pleura to prevent overgrowth by contaminating mesothelial cells was also vital. Daily observation of cell numbers and doubling time was also required in order to determine the optimal time for bead separation as time between each passage differed between donors and did not appear related to passage number or disease severity.
Endothelial cell extraction employed bead separation with magnetic dynal beads for CD31 (endothelial cell surface marker) and UEA-1 (an endothelial based lectin). Other researchers have previously reported difficulties when using CD31 dynal beads, hypothesising that disruption of cell surface CD31 by beads inhibited the cell to cell interactions required for successful growth in culture . We did not encounter such problems, although doubling time immediately post bead separation was more prolonged.
By passage 4–6, cells appeared free from contaminating spindle shaped cells and were characterised according to a standard protocol developed using commercially available cells. The commercially available cells were used both to set a standard against which the cells isolated could be characterised and to ensure that precious isolated primary cells were not used for optimisation of experimental protocols. Comparing the cells isolated from patients with emphysema to those isolated from lung resection operations and commercially available cells provided a further control.
The immunocytochemical detection of cell surface markers via confocal microscopy confirmed the isolated cells were endothelial, staining positively for the endothelial marker CD31 with weak/absent staining for mesenchymal markers. This was further confirmed by flow cytometry, with cells staining positively for the endothelial cell marker CD31 and negatively for the fibroblast marker CD90. These approaches proved very cell efficient, requiring only small numbers of cells for full characterisation (~1×106), thus preserving large numbers of cells for use in future studies.
Plant derived lectins have previously been employed to differentiate between microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells . We encountered difficulties with non-specific binding of the lectins Griffonia (Bandeiraea) simplicifolia and Helix pomatia previously used to differentiate between microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells respectively both on single cells and on paraffin embedded tissue. As a result, we investigated E-selectin (CD62E) expression as an alternative method to differentiate between microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells. E-Selectin (CD62E) and P-Selectin (CD62P) are receptor molecules for monocytes and neutrophils that are expressed on activated endothelial cells . CD62E, in contrast to CD62P which is stored in Weibel-Palade bodies in endothelial cells, is transcriptionally induced on microvascular endothelial cells in response to cytokine stimulation . Capillaries are not thought to express CD62E [23, 24]. Thus quiescent microvascular cells do not express CD62E but following activation intraacinar arterioles and venules express CD62E, while capillaries remain negative for CD62E. In our studies, the isolated CD31 positive cells showed very low (<5%) staining for CD62E at baseline. In response to stimulation with TNFα, there was inducible staining in around 30-50% of the isolated cells at 1 hour. Inducible CD62E in response to TNFα suggests these endothelial cells are microvascular. Furthermore, the presence of a subpopulation that was endothelial (i.e. positive for CD31) but did not up-regulate CD62E in response to TNFα suggests that the cells in this subpopulation are pulmonary capillary endothelial cells. Importantly this subpopulation was greater in the cells isolated from patients with emphysema compared with commercially available cells from Promocell used in the optimisation experiments. These pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells may therefore provide a more appropriate model than the current commercially available cells.
Infection is undoubtedly the major challenge to successful isolation and investigation of human LMVECs. Due to the inherent risks of infection whilst isolating the cells, the lobe of lung was placed in media containing 1% PSA prior to processing. 1% PSA was included in all MV2 media used in cell culture, the risk of infection being deemed greater than any adverse effect on growth kinetics the antimicrobials may have. In spite of this, a number of cell cultures were lost to infection, mostly around passage 6. With cell aging, growth kinetics reduced, with greater time to confluence. Cells therefore spent a longer time in culture with each successive passage, increasing the likelihood of infection. Amphotericin was included as we encountered more fungal infections than bacterial infections.
As with all ex vivo cell culture systems, inherent limitations are associated. Cells were passaged 3–5 times prior to obtaining pure cobblestone cultures which were characterized as endothelial. Cells therefore have a protracted culture period, with possible associated increased senescence and change in cell characteristic. Cells were grown in MV2 media (Promocell) which included 5% fetal calf serum supplementation and other survival factors such as hydrocortisone (0.2 ug/ml), recombinant human epidermal growth factor (5 ng/ml) fibroblast growth factor (10 ng/ml) vascular endothelial growth factor (0.5 ng/ml) and insulin like growth factor (Long R3) (20 ng/ml). The addition of hydrocortisone to cell culture media has been a contentious matter due to concerns over increased cell stress and how this may change cellular physiology. The concentration of hydrocortisone in MV2 media (Promocell) is considerably lower than in other types of microvascular endothelial cell media and its omission led to cell death.
Finally, our method of cell isolation can be applied to other respiratory diseases in which the pulmonary microvasculature may be pivotal such as pulmonary arterial hypertension and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Indeed we have successfully isolated large numbers of cells from these pathologies (data not shown) with higher yields of cells at lower passage than the emphysema model.
In conclusion, pulmonary microvasculature endothelial cells can be isolated from severely emphysematous lungs removed at transplantation with good success (71%). Full characterisation of these cells confirms these to be of high purity and of microvascular origin. Successful culture yields large numbers of cells that can be cryopreserved and later reanimated for use in mechanistic studies. We propose that these cells provide a more biologically relevant cell model for investigating the pulmonary microvasculature and the pathogenesis of emphysema.
- MacNee W, Tuder RM: New paradigms in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease I. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2009,6(6):527–531.PubMedView Article
- Shapiro SD: Vascular atrophy and VEGFR-2 signaling: old theories of pulmonary emphysema meet new data. J Clin Invest 2000,106(11):1309–1310.PubMedView Article
- Barnes PJ: The cytokine network in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2009,41(6):631–638.PubMedView Article
- Jaffe EA, Nachman RL, Becker CJ, Minick CR: Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins. Identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria. J Clin Invest 1973,52(11):2745–2756.PubMedView Article
- Giard DJ: In vitro cultivation of human tumors: establishment of cell lines derived from a series of solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1973,51(5):1417–1423.PubMed
- Winton HL: Cell lines of pulmonary and non-pulmonary origin as tools to study the effects of house dust mite proteinases on the regulation of epithelial permeability. Clin Exp Allergy 1998,28(10):1273–1285.PubMedView Article
- Wan H: Tight junction properties of the immortalized human bronchial epithelial cell lines Calu-3 and 16HBE14o. Eur Respir J 2000,15(6):1058–1068.PubMedView Article
- Skelin M, Rupnik M, Cencic A: Pancreatic beta cell lines and their applications in diabetes mellitus research. ALTEX 2010,27(2):105–113.PubMed
- Georgopoulos NT, Kirkwood LA, Varley CL, Maclaine NJ, Aziz N, Southgate J: Immortalisation of normal human urothelial cells compromises differentiation capacity. Eur Urol 2011,60(1):141–149.PubMedView Article
- Chung-Welch N, Shepro D, Dunham B, Hechtman HB: Prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2 secretions by bovine pulmonary microvessel endothelial cells are altered by changes in culture conditions. J Cell Physiol 1988,135(2):224–234.PubMedView Article
- Meyrick B, Hoover R, Jones MR, Berry LC, Brigham KL: In vitro effects of endotoxin on bovine and sheep lung microvascular and pulmonary artery endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 1989,138(1):165–174.PubMedView Article
- Folkman J, Haudenschild CC, Zetter BR: Long-term culture of capillary endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979,76(10):5217–5221.PubMedView Article
- Lou JN: An improved method for isolation of microvascular endothelial cells from normal and inflamed human lung. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1998,34(7):529–536.PubMedView Article
- Hewett PW, Murray JC: Human microvessel endothelial cells: isolation, culture and characterization. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1993,29A(11):823–830.PubMedView Article
- Hewett PW, Murray JC: Human lung microvessel endothelial cells: isolation, culture, and characterization. Microvasc Res 1993,46(1):89–102.PubMedView Article
- Britton M: The burden of COPD in the U.K.: results from the confronting COPD survey. Respir Med 2003,97(Suppl C):S71-S79.PubMedView Article
- Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS: Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001,163(5):1256–1276.PubMed
- Fabbri LM, Hurd SS: Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of COPD: 2003 update. Eur Respir J 2003,22(1):1–2.PubMedView Article
- Jackson CJ, Garbett PK, Nissen B, Schrieber L: Binding of human endothelium to ulex europaeus I-coated dynabeads: application to the isolation of microvascular endothelium. J Cell Sci 1990,96(Pt 2):257–262.PubMed
- Gargett CE, Bucak K, Rogers PA: Isolation, characterization and long-term culture of human myometrial microvascular endothelial cells. Hum Reprod 2000,15(2):293–301.PubMedView Article
- King J: Structural and functional characteristics of lung macro- and microvascular endothelial cell phenotypes. Microvasc Res 2004,67(2):139–151.PubMedView Article
- Subramaniam M, Koedam JA, Wagner DD: Divergent fates of P- and E-selectins after their expression on the plasma membrane. Mol Biol Cell 1993,4(8):791–801.PubMed
- Garlanda C, Dejana E: Heterogeneity of endothelial cells. Specific markers. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997,17(7):1193–1202.PubMedView Article
- Mutin M, Dignat-George F, Sampol J: Immunologic phenotype of cultured endothelial cells: quantitative analysis of cell surface molecules. Tissue Antigens 1997,50(5):449–458.PubMedView Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.