The association of down-regulated toll-like receptor 4 expression with airflow limitation and emphysema in smokers
© Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 18 August 2012
Accepted: 29 October 2012
Published: 21 November 2012
An association between innate immunity including Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and COPD is reported recently; TLR4 deficiency in lung can cause emphysema in animals, which is not evident in humans. We analyzed the association of TLR4 expression, airflow limitation and emphysema in smokers.
We enrolled patients of ≥40years old with smoking histories of ≥10 pack-years and who had undergone lung resection. We measured TLR4 expression in lung lysates. The severity of emphysema was evaluated on computed tomography. TLR4 expression was also evaluated immunohistochemically.
In total, 53 patients were enrolled. Forced expiratory volume in one second per forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) increased (P=0.03) and emphysema score decreased (P=0.01) as TLR4 expression increased. These were still significant, in multiple regression analysis including sex, age, tuberculosis history, smoking history and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) usage. We also classified patients as high, intermediate, and low expressers according to TLR4 expression. Although no differences in age, gender, tuberculosis, or smoking history were observed among the groups, emphysema severity increased significantly (P = 0.02) and FEV1/FVC decreased significantly (P = 0.006) in TLR4 low expresser. The difference in TLR4 expression based on immunohistochemistry was most prominent in bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells.
Down-regulated TLR4 expression in lung was associated with emphysema and airflow limitation in smokers.
KeywordsSmoking Emphysema COPD Toll-like receptor
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major global health problem, with a prevalence of 5–25% in adults . COPD is projected to be the fourth leading cause of death by 2020 [2, 3]. Smoking is the most important cause of COPD, accounting for 90% of the cumulative risk . Nevertheless, not all smokers will develop COPD. In fact, only a small portion (about 15%) will develop clinically relevant disease [5, 6]. Compared with non-smokers, smokers have a steeper lung function decline. However, this is only true of susceptible smokers, as non-susceptible smokers can have the same lung function decline as never-smokers . This implies that additional pathogenesis is involved in airway limitation and the development of emphysema.
Several candidate genes and biomarkers have been suggested to explain “additional pathogenesis” in smokers . Candidate genes regulate proteases and antiproteases, modulate the metabolism of toxic substances in cigarette smoke, participate in mucocillary clearance, or influence inflammatory mediators , but the only well-established genetic risk factor is alpha-1-antitrypsin [10, 11]. Microsatellite DNA instability has been proposed as a useful genetic screening marker for susceptible smokers . However, unlike other diseases, COPD lacks established markers that can be applied to track disease progression .
Recently, some studies have reported an association between innate immunity and COPD. The main components of innate immunity are phagocytes of inflammatory cells, which discriminate between pathogens and self cells by utilizing signals from Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLRs may be important in COPD because they participate in defense against viral and bacterial infections, and infections in the airway worsen the disease process in the lungs of patients with COPD . Among the TLRs, TLR4 appears to play a pivotal role in lung homeostasis by contributing to the defense of endothelial cells against oxidants [15, 16]. Moreover, TLR4 deficiency in the lung leads to spontaneous emphysema in animals, which is associated with an oxidant/antioxidant imbalance . Thus, difference in TLR4 expression has been associated with COPD development in some animals, but this is not evident in humans.
In the present study, we hypothesized that TLR4 expression differs among people and that this can be associated with the emphysema or airflow limitation. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the association between emphysema severity, TLR4 expression in lung tissue and emphysema.
Material and methods
We recruited all patients with smoking history ≥10 pack-years, who were ≥40 years old, and whose lung had been resected for lung cancer from 2008 to 2010 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. We enrolled the patients whose normal lung tissues were available from a certified tissue bank. The lung tissues were dissected by pathologists to discriminate normal tissue from cancer and then preserved at −70°C until the experiment. The tissue was taken at peripheral area, at least 3cm apart from the cancer. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (B1008/110-006).
Western blot assay
TLR4 expression was assessed by Western blot analysis. Normal lung tissues were homogenized (IKA T10 Basic; Younjin Corp., Gunpo, Korea) in lysis buffer (cell signaling, Denver, MA, USA) and 30ug protein was used for each sample. Western blot analysis was performed with anti-TLR4 antibody (H-80; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at a concentration of 0.2 μg/ml as previously described . The signal was detected and quantified using Scion Image v7.0 (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD, USA). All samples were normalized to actin signals. The results were used to categorize patients into three groups: high (TLR4/actin > 0.5), intermediate (0.15 ≤ TLR4/actin < 0.5), and low expressers (TLR4/actin < 0.15).
Radiological features and grading of emphysema severity
Computed tomography (CT) images of all enrolled subjects were reviewed by an experienced chest radiologist (T.J.K.) and a pulmonologist (S.W.L.) without patients’ information. After jointly scoring 10 patients, who were not enrolled in this study, and adjusting their eye levels, the two readers independently reviewed the images. Any disagreements were discussed by the two readers, and another experienced pulmonologist (C.T.L.) helped in reaching an agreement. Preoperative CT images within 1 month before the resection were reviewed, and emphysema severity was scored by the Goddard classification . Briefly, six CT images were selected for each patient: right and left fields of the upper lung (1 cm above the superior margin of the aortic arch), of the middle lung (1 cm below the carina), and of the lower lung (3 cm above top of the diaphragm). We scored each image from 0 to 3 according to the proportion of vascular disruption and the areas of low attenuation. A score of 0 meant no abnormality; 1, 0–25% involvement; 2, 25–50%; 3, 50–75%; and 4, 75–100% involvement. Emphysema was graded based on the total score of the six images: 0–7, mild; 8–15, moderate; and 16–18, severe emphysema.
CT scanning was performed during full inspiration using various CT scanners, including a Brilliance-64, MX-8000 IDT, and iCT 256 (Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA). Scanning was conducted from the thoracic inlet to the upper portion of the kidneys. Images were obtained using a window level of 600 Hounsfield units (HU), a window width of 1500 HU (lung window), a level of 30 HU, and a width of 400 HU (mediastinal window). Conventional CT images were obtained from the thoracic inlet to the lung base using a 3-mm section thickness.
Pulmonary function test
All patients underwent a pulmonary function test within 1 month before resection. We used the results (without bronchodilation) that contained the largest forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Spirometry was conducted by trained pulmonary technicians, according to the 2005 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society recommendations  using a Vmax229 spirometer (Sensor-Medics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA).
Exposure of rats to cigarette smoke
We performed animal experiments to exclude the possibility that smoking and acquired emphysema development themselves can affect TLR4 expression, therefore to make causal relationship more clearly. Three eight-week-old inbred female Lewis rats (Orient Bio, Seongnam, Korea) were exposed to smoke as previously described . Three control animals inhaled only clean room air. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Asan Medical Center approved this study.
To analyze the major cells that resulted in a difference in TLR4 expression, immunohistochemical staining for TLR4 was performed in three randomly selected patients with emphysema who were low TLR4 expressers and three randomly selected patients without emphysema who were high TLR4 expressers. For the IHC analysis, 4-μm-thick sections were cut from the patient’s lung tissue blocks, deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated in a graded alcohol series. Antigen retrieval was performed in pH 6.0 citrate-phosphate buffer using a microwave oven for 15 min. The sections were incubated with anti-TLR4 antibody (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h at room temperature. To detect the signals, an Envision kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) was used according to the manufacturer’s instruction. An experienced pathologist (J.H.P.), who was blinded to the patient information, read the IHC findings. TLR4 expression was graded from 0 to 3 (0, no or very faint staining; 1, positive staining; 2, strong positive staining; 3, very strong positive staining).
Emphysema severity and lung function according to TLR4 expression were compared using linear regression analysis. Comparison between groups was analyzed by Spearman correlation for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. In the multivariate analysis, the backward selection method was used to exclude multi-collinearity. Statistical significance was assessed at a two-tailed P-value of 0.05. Agreements in the emphysema scores between the two readers were determined using the κ statistic . All data are presented as means ± standard deviations. All statistical analyses were conducted using PASW software ver. 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Emphysema severity and pulmonary function according to TLR4 expression
Comparison of characteristics and pulmonary function between the groups
(TLR4/actin < 0.15)
(0.15 ≤ TLR4/actin < 0.5)
(TLR4/actin ≥ 0.5)
N = 12
N = 25
N = 16
65.3 ± 8.3
64.0 ± 9.2
67.4 ± 7.8
Male gender, n (%)
38.8 ± 27.2
35.6 ± 17.8
38.8 ± 22.3
Current smoker, n (%)
TB history present, n (%)
ICS users*, n (%)
Agreement between the two readers (T.J.K. and S.W.L.) for emphysema grades was almost perfect (κ = 0.82, P < 0.001). The differences in emphysema scores between the two readers were 0 for 30 (56.6%) patients, 1 for 12 (22.6%) patients, 2 for nine (17.0%) patients, and ≥3 for two (3.8%) patients.
Major cells resulting in TLR4 expression differences in lung tissue
TLR4 Expression among inbred rats according to acquired emphysema development
We showed that a down-regulated TLR4 expression in the lung can be a predictor or biomarker of emphysema in smokers or biomarker of emphysema, as patients with down-regulated TLR4 expression had a greater probability of developing emphysema and airflow limitation. Differences in TLR4 expression were attributable mainly to expression levels in bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells. Smoke-induced emphysema itself did not appear to alter TLR4 expression; therefore TLR4 expression seems to affect emphysema development or progression, rather than vice versa.
Several studies have shown that defects in innate TLR4-mediated immunity can be associated with emphysema. TLR4 knockout causes spontaneous emphysema in animals . The presence of the TLR4-T339I polymorphism is associated with a 2.4-fold increased risk for developing COPD, highlighting the relationship between impaired innate immunity and COPD development . The Gly299 allele is present at a decreased frequency among patients with COPD and may be absent from COPD patients who have never smoked . Our findings can make an important contribution on the relationship between innate immunity and COPD, because they show that down-regulated TLR4 expression in the lung may be related to emphysema in humans, as in animals.
An association between TLR4 expression and COPD has also been noted previously. Most studies have suggested that TLR4 expression is decreased in the blood of patients with COPD. The peripheral blood TH1 cell response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is impaired in patients with COPD compared with the response in never-smokers, and TLR4 overexpression via transfection restores this impairment . Compared with less severe disease, severe COPD is associated with reduced TLR4 expression in the nasal epithelium . In contrast to some positive results in blood, cells in a sputum analysis failed to show this relationship. TLR4 expression on sputum neutrophils was not different in COPD patients , and TLR4 mRNA in induced sputum did not differ significantly between COPD patients and healthy controls . A previous study showed no significant difference in TLR4 expression in epithelial cells between COPD and normal subjects, but several factors such as smoking history, age and sex were not controlled and small number subjects limited the power of test . This study is meaningful because we compare the TLR4 expression among smokers. Previous studies compare the expression between smoker COPD and never-smoker controls [25, 33].
Theoretically, TLR4 deficiency may partially protect against smoke-induced emphysema, because TLR4 deficiency partially prevents smoke-induced influx of dendritic cells, lymphocytes, and neutrophils . Clear correlations have been found between the numbers of these inflammatory cells and the severity of COPD [34, 35]. However, previous studies and our study have shown that TLR4 deficiency does not protect against the development of emphysema. To the contrary, it appears to be related with emphysema development, which can be explained by the role of TLR4 in the respiratory system. In TLR4 deficient mouse, NADPH oxidase was up-regulated in lungs, resulting in increased oxidant generation and elastolytic activity . Expression of the autophagic protein LC3B and markers of cell death in response to cigarette smoke exposure were increased in epithelial cells from TLR4 deficient mice . Overall, TLR4 exerts a protective role with respect to smoke-induced emphysema development. It is not still evident whether the same mechanism is applied to human and further study is necessary. TLR4 expression seemed associated with emphysema severity which was reported to be more correlated with airflow limitation (FEV1/FVC) than COPD stage defined by FEV1 (% predicted) .
Several TLR4-dependent mechanisms are likely to be involved in cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation. Smoke may activate TLR4 signaling on pulmonary epithelial cells and transmigrated resident cells such as macrophages, which act as the first line of defense against external threats [16, 37]. Innate immunity mediated by TLR4 also triggers the first-line host defense response to Gram-negative bacterial infections and is crucial for initiating subsequent T cell-mediated adaptive immune responses . TLR4 expression on the respiratory epithelium allows for rapid activation of host defenses against outside stimuli such as smoke and bacteria, resulting in the induction of inflammatory mediators and antimicrobial peptides. The increased risk for bacterial infection in patients with COPD may be caused by an inability to effectively clear bacteria and by misguided inflammatory responses. Emphysema develops due to chronic inflammation and impaired matrix and cellular repair. Thus, an impaired defense owing to TLR4 deficiency combined with repeated inflammation may result in the development of emphysema. However, it is unclear whether the reduced TLR4 expression in patients with COPD is an adaptive response to increased exposure to external threats such as Gram-negative bacteria or smoke, as part of the phenomenon of endotoxin tolerance.
Several limitations of this study should be noted. First, the causal relationship between down-regulated TLR4 expression and emphysema is ambiguous. To make a firm conclusion, smokers should be followed for several decades after obtaining lung tissues or respiratory cells; however, such studies are not practical and present ethical issues. Similar experiment using other tissues or blood-born cells could have clarified this issue more, but we could not because they were not available. However, our data showed that smoke-induced emphysema itself did not affect TLR4 expression, providing more evidence that down-regulated TLR4 expression results in emphysema. Previous reports showing that TLR4 knockdown induces spontaneous emphysema also support this idea . Second, TLR4 expression can be induced or decreased by LPS stimulation [29, 38]. Thus, TLR4 expression levels can vary with different clinical conditions such as Gram-negative bacterial infections. In our study, lung tissues were taken during elective lung resection, when patients were clinically stable without evidence of pulmonary infection or exacerbation. Third, we could not find a causable gene that could explain the differential TLR4 expression. Although we examined several single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the TLR4 gene, including minor alleles with frequencies >5% in the HAP map of Asians, no significant results were identified (data not shown). Epigenetic factors may be associated with the differential expression of TLR4. Fourth, functional aspects by down-regulation of TLR4 expression, such as cytokine secretion, could not be evaluated and because of the retrospective nature of this study.
In conclusion, down-regulated TLR4 expression in lung was associated with emphysema and airflow limitation in smokers. This report will broaden our understanding of COPD pathogenesis, although further studies are required to clarify a causal relationship between down-regulated TLR4 expression and emphysema.
The study was supported by grant no. 02-2010-040 from the SNUBH Research Fund. The funding sources had no role in study design, data collection or analysis, manuscript preparation, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
- Mannino DM, Buist AS: Global burden of COPD: risk factors, prevalence, and future trends. Lancet. 2007, 370: 765-773. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61380-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murray CJ, Lopez AD, Black R, Mathers CD, Shibuya K, Ezzati M, Salomon JA, Michaud CM, Walker N, Vos T: Global burden of disease 2005: call for collaborators. Lancet. 2007, 370: 109-110. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61064-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mathers CD, Loncar D: Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006, 3: e442-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- American Thoracic Society: Cigarette smoking and health. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996, 153: 861-865.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davis RM, Novotny TE: The epidemiology of cigarette smoking and its impact on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989, 140: S82-S84. 10.1164/ajrccm/140.1.82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burrows B, Knudson RJ, Cline MG, Lebowitz MD: Quantitative relationships between cigarette smoking and ventilatory function. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977, 115: 195-205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fletcher C, Peto R: The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. Br Med J. 1977, 1: 1645-1648. 10.1136/bmj.1.6077.1645.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tzortzaki EG, Tsoumakidou M, Makris D, Siafakas NM: Laboratory markers for COPD in "susceptible" smokers. Clin Chim Acta. 2006, 364: 124-138. 10.1016/j.cca.2005.06.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ouellette DR: The answer is fifteen percent: what is the question?. Chest. 2004, 125: 3-5. 10.1378/chest.125.1.3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Black LF, Kueppers F: Alpha1-Antitrypsin deficiency in nonsmokers. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978, 117: 421-428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janus ED, Phillips NT, Carrell RW: Smoking, lung function, and alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency. Lancet. 1985, 1: 152-154.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siafakas NM, Tzortzaki EG, Sourvinos G, Bouros D, Tzanakis N, Kafatos A, Spandidos D: Microsatellite DNA instability in COPD. Chest. 1999, 116: 47-51. 10.1378/chest.116.1.47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weiss ST, DeMeo DL, Postma DS: COPD: problems in diagnosis and measurement. Eur Respir J Suppl. 2003, 41: 4s-12s.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sarir H, Henricks PA, van Houwelingen AH, Nijkamp FP, Folkerts G: Cells, mediators and Toll-like receptors in COPD. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008, 585: 346-353. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson GB, Brunn GJ, Kodaira Y, Platt JL: Receptor-mediated monitoring of tissue well-being via detection of soluble heparan sulfate by Toll-like receptor 4. J Immunol. 2002, 168: 5233-5239.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maes T, Bracke KR, Vermaelen KY, Demedts IK, Joos GF, Pauwels RA, Brusselle GG: Murine TLR4 is implicated in cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2006, 141: 354-368. 10.1159/000095462.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Shan P, Jiang G, Cohn L, Lee PJ: Toll-like receptor 4 deficiency causes pulmonary emphysema. J Clin Invest. 2006, 116: 3050-3059. 10.1172/JCI28139.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim DR, Park MY, Lee CS, Shim SH, Yoon HI, Lee JH, Sung MW, Kim YS, Lee CT: Combination of vorinostat and adenovirus-TRAIL exhibits a synergistic antitumor effect by increasing transduction and transcription of TRAIL in lung cancer cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 2011, 18: 467-477. 10.1038/cgt.2011.11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goddard PR, Nicholson EM, Laszlo G, Watt I: Computed tomography in pulmonary emphysema. Clin Radiol. 1982, 33: 379-387. 10.1016/S0009-9260(82)80301-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, et al: Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005, 26: 319-338. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huh JW, Kim SY, Lee JH, Lee JS, Van Ta Q, Kim M, Oh YM, Lee YS, Lee SD: Bone marrow cells repair cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in rats. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2011, 301: L255-266. 10.1152/ajplung.00253.2010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33: 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: Workshop report: global strategy for diagnosis, management, and prevention of COPD. 2011, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- MacRedmond RE, Greene CM, Dorscheid DR, McElvaney NG, O'Neill SJ: Epithelial expression of TLR4 is modulated in COPD and by steroids, salmeterol and cigarette smoke. Respir Res. 2007, 8: 84-10.1186/1465-9921-8-84.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geraghty P, Dabo AJ, D'Armiento J: TLR4 protein contributes to cigarette smoke-induced matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) expression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286: 30211-30218. 10.1074/jbc.M111.238824.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pace E, Ferraro M, Minervini MI, Vitulo P, Pipitone L, Chiappara G, Siena L, Montalbano AM, Johnson M, Gjomarkaj M: Beta defensin-2 is reduced in central but not in distal airways of smoker COPD patients. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e33601-10.1371/journal.pone.0033601.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Speletas M, Merentiti V, Kostikas K, Liadaki K, Minas M, Gourgoulianis K, Germenis AE: Association of TLR4-T399I polymorphism with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in smokers. Clin Dev Immunol. 2009, 2009: 260286-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rohde G, Klein W, Arinir U, Hagedorn M, Duerig N, TB T, Gillissen A, Schultze-Werninghaus G, TE J: Association of the ASP299GLY TLR4 polymorphism with COPD. Respir Med. 2006, 100: 892-896. 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.08.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Knobloch J, Schild K, Jungck D, Urban K, Muller K, Schweda EK, Rupp J, Koch A: The T-helper cell type 1 immune response to gram-negative bacterial infections is impaired in COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011, 183: 204-214. 10.1164/rccm.201002-0199OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Scheele I, Larsson K, Dahlen B, Billing B, Skedinger M, Lantz AS, Palmberg L: Toll-like receptor expression in smokers with and without COPD. Respir Med. 2011, 105: 1222-1230. 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.02.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baines KJ, Simpson JL, Gibson PG: Innate immune responses are increased in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e18426-10.1371/journal.pone.0018426.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nadigel J, Prefontaine D, Baglole CJ, Maltais F, Bourbeau J, Eidelman DH, Hamid Q: Cigarette smoke increases TLR4 and TLR9 expression and induces cytokine production from CD8(+) T cells in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res. 2011, 12: 149-10.1186/1465-9921-12-149.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- An CH, Wang XM, Lam HC, Ifedigbo E, Washko GR, Ryter SW, Choi AM: TLR4 Deficiency Promotes Autophagy during Cigarette Smoke-Induced Pulmonary Emphysema. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012, [Epud ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Barnes PJ, Shapiro SD, Pauwels RA: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Eur Respir J. 2003, 22: 672-688. 10.1183/09031936.03.00040703.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S, Woods R, Elliott WM, Buzatu L, Cherniack RM, Rogers RM, Sciurba FC, Coxson HO, Pare PD: The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350: 2645-2653. 10.1056/NEJMoa032158.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gould GA, Redpath AT, Ryan M, Warren PM, Best JJ, Flenley DC, MacNee W: Lung CT density correlates with measurements of airflow limitation and the diffusing capacity. Eur Respir J. 1991, 4: 141-146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R: Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2004, 5: 987-995. 10.1038/ni1112.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nomura F, Akashi S, Sakao Y, Sato S, Kawai T, Matsumoto M, Nakanishi K, Kimoto M, Miyake K, Takeda K, Akira S: Cutting edge: endotoxin tolerance in mouse peritoneal macrophages correlates with down-regulation of surface toll-like receptor 4 expression. J Immunol. 2000, 164: 3476-3479.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.